<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Peter Thomas - Award-winning Business Intelligence and Cultural Transformation Expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterjamesthomas.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the confluence of business, change and technology. Areas covered include business intelligence, cultural transformation, business and IT alignment, business and IT strategy, project execution and social media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consider including&#8230; by Peter Thomas</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/2011/07/05/consider-including/#comment-21326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterjamesthomas.com/?p=6443#comment-21326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for taking the time to comment Christine.

Some thoughts on Google&#039;s general approach to Social Media (including webmail) from The Atlantic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/05/how-google-can-win-the-social-media-war/257480/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment Christine.</p>
<p>Some thoughts on Google&#8217;s general approach to Social Media (including webmail) from The Atlantic <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/05/how-google-can-win-the-social-media-war/257480/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact details by Peter Thomas</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/about-this-site/contact/#comment-21287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?page_id=610#comment-21287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Martin,

Good to hear from you and thanks for the comments :-).

I hope that you are well, how is Japan treating you?

All the best

Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin,</p>
<p>Good to hear from you and thanks for the comments :-).</p>
<p>I hope that you are well, how is Japan treating you?</p>
<p>All the best</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact details by Martin Berridge</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/about-this-site/contact/#comment-21283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Berridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?page_id=610#comment-21283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Peter - interesting blog hope all is well - will spare you my cynical and facetious comments! Hope your wordpress dodgy mercator press app now shows a hit to your site from Japan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter &#8211; interesting blog hope all is well &#8211; will spare you my cynical and facetious comments! Hope your wordpress dodgy mercator press app now shows a hit to your site from Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consider including&#8230; by Christine Robinson</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/2011/07/05/consider-including/#comment-21251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christine Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterjamesthomas.com/?p=6443#comment-21251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You shouldn&#039;t have to use an add-on to disable a Gmail feature, but it seems that they really don&#039;t plan to remove &quot;consider including.&quot;  Gmelius was ridiculously easy. Click a button, tick some boxes, done.  

&quot;Foolish and short-sighted&quot; seems to be a popular business model.  Or I&#039;m becoming curmudgeonly.  Thank you, Google, for stealing my idealism and hope for humanity.  (Not really.)

~Christine]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t have to use an add-on to disable a Gmail feature, but it seems that they really don&#8217;t plan to remove &#8220;consider including.&#8221;  Gmelius was ridiculously easy. Click a button, tick some boxes, done.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Foolish and short-sighted&#8221; seems to be a popular business model.  Or I&#8217;m becoming curmudgeonly.  Thank you, Google, for stealing my idealism and hope for humanity.  (Not really.)</p>
<p>~Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is outsourcing business intelligence a good idea? by Peter Thomas</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/14/is-outsourcing-business-intelligence-a-good-idea/#comment-19791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-19791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tigor,

Thank you for reading and taking the time to comment.

As I say, what might be termed the programming resource is the only element that I would consider outsourcing. For mid-sized companies, this is likely to be of a size where the economies of scale are outweighed by the risks, lengthened communication lines and lack of flexibility (understandably) inherent in many outsourcing contracts.

Out of interest, what is your own role? It always hels to get disclosure on these matters, lest other readers infer a conflict of interest.

All the best

Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tigor,</p>
<p>Thank you for reading and taking the time to comment.</p>
<p>As I say, what might be termed the programming resource is the only element that I would consider outsourcing. For mid-sized companies, this is likely to be of a size where the economies of scale are outweighed by the risks, lengthened communication lines and lack of flexibility (understandably) inherent in many outsourcing contracts.</p>
<p>Out of interest, what is your own role? It always hels to get disclosure on these matters, lest other readers infer a conflict of interest.</p>
<p>All the best</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is outsourcing business intelligence a good idea? by Tigor</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/14/is-outsourcing-business-intelligence-a-good-idea/#comment-19790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tigor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-19790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter, Thank you for the great article. 

My experience is somewhat different. 

There is business and technical aspect of BI. Both aspects are important. Depending on what data sources are used, you can have a business /information analyst which delivers specifications which an external consultant can use to design a data warehouse and ETL. Those activities can en should be outsourced, I believe. There is no way an internal developer can match the skill level and experience of a consultant who have seen a lot of  data warehouses in different companies. Learning &quot;hard&quot; technical skills cost time and money. This is an argument which managers understand. 

Even iterative development which often comes at a later stadium when reports of OLAP-cubes have to be build, can be done by an external experienced BI-consultant. He has done it many times before, after all.  

Tigor]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, Thank you for the great article. </p>
<p>My experience is somewhat different. </p>
<p>There is business and technical aspect of BI. Both aspects are important. Depending on what data sources are used, you can have a business /information analyst which delivers specifications which an external consultant can use to design a data warehouse and ETL. Those activities can en should be outsourced, I believe. There is no way an internal developer can match the skill level and experience of a consultant who have seen a lot of  data warehouses in different companies. Learning &#8220;hard&#8221; technical skills cost time and money. This is an argument which managers understand. </p>
<p>Even iterative development which often comes at a later stadium when reports of OLAP-cubes have to be build, can be done by an external experienced BI-consultant. He has done it many times before, after all.  </p>
<p>Tigor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consider including&#8230; by Peter Thomas</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/2011/07/05/consider-including/#comment-19394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterjamesthomas.com/?p=6443#comment-19394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly everyone hating it doesn&#039;t seem to hold much sway with Google - they are probably too busy diluting their shareholders&#039; say in the company to worry about issues like customer complaints.

Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly everyone hating it doesn&#8217;t seem to hold much sway with Google &#8211; they are probably too busy diluting their shareholders&#8217; say in the company to worry about issues like customer complaints.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wager by Bat-and-ball Data Quality &#171; Liliendahl on Data Quality</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/2011/07/20/wager/#comment-19391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bat-and-ball Data Quality &#171; Liliendahl on Data Quality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterjamesthomas.com/?p=6522#comment-19391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In Britain, where I live now, cricket is huge and can be used to attract awareness of data issues. As late as yesterday the Ordnance Survey, a government body that have registries with addresses, coordinates and maps, made a blog post called Anyone for cricket? British blogger Peter Thomas also wrote among others a post on cricket and data quality called Wager. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Britain, where I live now, cricket is huge and can be used to attract awareness of data issues. As late as yesterday the Ordnance Survey, a government body that have registries with addresses, coordinates and maps, made a blog post called Anyone for cricket? British blogger Peter Thomas also wrote among others a post on cricket and data quality called Wager. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is outsourcing business intelligence a good idea? by Peter Thomas</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/14/is-outsourcing-business-intelligence-a-good-idea/#comment-19363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-19363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to comment. If I have it right you are asking about bringing an outsourced BI function back in house - do I have that right?

I guess new projects vs business as usual might be somewhat related to how the outsourced systems are perceived. I&#039;m guessing that if they were great, then keeping them outsourced would make sense as it had delivered, so perhaps the question would not arise. Am I right in assuming that this path has been less than successful?

Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment. If I have it right you are asking about bringing an outsourced BI function back in house &#8211; do I have that right?</p>
<p>I guess new projects vs business as usual might be somewhat related to how the outsourced systems are perceived. I&#8217;m guessing that if they were great, then keeping them outsourced would make sense as it had delivered, so perhaps the question would not arise. Am I right in assuming that this path has been less than successful?</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is outsourcing business intelligence a good idea? by Fdsilva</title>
		<link>http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/14/is-outsourcing-business-intelligence-a-good-idea/#comment-19361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fdsilva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-19361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Peter, Thanks for the article. A lot of good arguments as to why BI is not really suited for outsourcing. 
Any thoughts on how to reverse an outsourced BI department when one realises the real value? Are new projects the best way to start rebuilding or operations of the existing BI solutions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter, Thanks for the article. A lot of good arguments as to why BI is not really suited for outsourcing.<br />
Any thoughts on how to reverse an outsourced BI department when one realises the real value? Are new projects the best way to start rebuilding or operations of the existing BI solutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
