Comments on: Why IT is not like Civil Engineering http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/20/why-it-is-not-like-civil-engineering/ Thoughts on the confluence of business, change and technology. Areas covered include business intelligence, cultural transformation, business and IT alignment, business and IT strategy, project execution and social media. Sun, 20 May 2012 04:05:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Peter Thomas http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/20/why-it-is-not-like-civil-engineering/#comment-774 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:35:45 +0000 http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?p=2067#comment-774 Anonymous comments are always so helpful – if you don’t want your name associated with what you say, why say it?

Still interested in what the problem was with what I wrote – care to elucidate?

]]> By: Prefer not to give http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/20/why-it-is-not-like-civil-engineering/#comment-773 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:20:38 +0000 http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?p=2067#comment-773 Don’t be a [deleted by Blog author - let's keep it clean shall we]. TV was right.

]]> By: Peter Thomas http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/20/why-it-is-not-like-civil-engineering/#comment-366 Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:33:12 +0000 http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?p=2067#comment-366 Hi TV,

Thanks for the comment.

What I probably meant to say was “If IT was really like Civil Engineering then [...]“, which is exactly what I did say.

Peter

]]> By: TV Srinivasan http://peterjamesthomas.com/2009/03/20/why-it-is-not-like-civil-engineering/#comment-355 Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:05:45 +0000 http://peterthomas.wordpress.com/?p=2067#comment-355 Dear Peter
You probably wanted to say, “If Civil Engineering was like IT” and not as if IT was like Civil Engineering in the beginning of the last para

]]>